Sam Dotson [00:00:00] Hi, folks. I'm Sam Dotson. Welcome to the show. Today, we're joined by Ph.D. neuroscientist Kevin McCairn. This is him up above now. Kevin's been doing some experiments. He gets in the lab and, you know, raises money to do actual science, data-driven science. I really appreciate some of the things that he comes up with. And he's been testing, doing a spectral analysis. This is kind of like the spectrum analyzer that we talked about from the electronics world where he's looking across all the chemicals in a certain compound. And in this case, he was analyzing vaccine vials for COVID 19.
Kevin McCairn [00:00:38] Hi, Sam. Thank you for having me on. And I may just correct a little.
Sam Dotson [00:00:45] Please do.
Kevin McCairn [00:00:46] What you said in the introduction there, just so that everyone is entirely clear. So with with the experiments that I have done, which is to, well, the premise of doing it was to check for graphene oxide, because there's been a number of analyses done, that I would consider, from people who lack the scientific credibility to be - not just credibility - the methodological techniques to answer that question.
Sam Dotson [00:01:21] Okay.
[00:01:22] That was the primary driver of looking at these vaccine samples. That included Sputnik, the Russian vaccine, Moderna and Pfizer.
Sam Dotson [00:01:36] Okay.
Kevin McCairn [00:01:37] And in order to do that, you can't just look under a light microscope and look at what inclusions or looking amorphous shapes and say, “aha, that looks like graphene oxide” as shown in the literature. You've got to be able to demonstrate it with quantitative equipment. And so the first round of investigations that we did, it was entirely premised on if there is graphene oxide in these vaccines, because graphene oxide is one of those buzzwords that's associated with the, how shall we say...?
Sam Dotson [00:02:22] The “razor blades”...
Kevin McCairn [00:02:23] Technocracy.
Sam Dotson [00:02:24] Cutting up the insides and all that. Yeah, I'm well aware of all everything that goes around with that.
Kevin McCairn [00:02:30] Yeah. And look, I'm not, I'm not going to sit here and say that's all nonsense. We're in a new paradigm with science where nanotechnology is at the fore. It's been like that for the last ten years, I would say more really. But it's when you really sort of began to see the literature moving in that direction and using that type of language. And so there was this idea circulating that the graphene oxide was being put in and it would engage in a form of self-assembly in the body that would be amenable to 5G, for example, and, you know, many, many other riffs on that theme. And, you know, there were a whole bunch of ne'er-do-wells who were pushing that from the very beginning of the outbreak, well, as the vaccines began to emerge. As the outbreak began, you know, I was one of the first to be pointing out that it was of lab origin.
Sam Dotson [00:03:48] Mm hmm.
Kevin McCairn [00:03:48] … There were very obvious signs of synthetic manipulation of the pathogen. And, you know, that's another sort of trench in which I'm fighting, which is that they're circulating or joined at the hip with the graphene people are the "viruses don't exist" people. And so, you know, anyone can hypothesize anything. You've got to bring data to support your assertions and premises. That's how we operate in science. Otherwise, it would have just collapsed under its own contradictions.
[00:04:29] And another reason for doing what I'm doing is that I have a deep-felt sense that science has been hijacked. Particularly the academies where, you know, there's the idea that there should be this free thinking, exploring any subject where the philosophy wants to take you, etc.. And in a sense, yes, I get out on the stream yesterday when we were looking at a couple of "no virus exists" individuals who were opining about that particular issue and I would agree with that — that the institutes have become slave to the drive for patents, manuscripts, grant funding, publications, etc. and they, in doing so, have lost their independence and because we've lost their independence, I would put forward the argument that people who should have been able to push back against the most improbable of hypotheses, whether it came from the mainstream, as to the origin of SARS-CoV-2, or the things like graphene oxide building nanobots inside your body and viruses not being real - it's because it's been lost that we find ourselves in the mess that we're in today.
[00:06:10] And yeah, so part of the original experimentation was to just go and test the premise of: is that graphene oxide in these vials? And, and in doing so you have to use molecular type analysis and there's multiple ways of doing that. But one of the more modern techniques is Raman spectroscopy, where you can use essentially a laser to excite the bonds between molecules and it will give you a particular spectral signature. And, you know, there's a whole library out there of how different molecules reflect in Raman spectroscopy. And so I took pure graphene oxide again, something that all of these people have never done, and showed that we could get the characteristic and spectral signature that we see with SARS-CoV-2. And the important point here is that I did everything live so people can see what's going on. So you can see what's being tested because anyone can put together a document and say, 'we did this Raman spectroscopy' and fake a spectral signature that you would see with it and say that's graphene oxide and we see it in these samples.
Sam Dotson [00:07:36] Mm hmm.
Kevin McCairn [00:07:36] And so in doing that, we found that any of these inclusions in the crystals that people have looked at, that, you know … they seemed somewhat different, I guess, compared to a regular saline-type crystal.
Sam Dotson [00:07:57] Yeah. Now, that's something I've looked into and looked at all the pictures of the dark field microscope —pictures of these kind of structure things. And I have a background in electrical engineering and I'm like, okay, if these things are assembling, why aren't you seeing a repeated pattern in batch after batch? Because they'd have to build the same components. And how are they supposed to interconnect? And I mean, it's possible there's some technology in there that's so far advanced beyond our understanding of science, but that's pretty unlikely. And, you know, it's just that's where that whole theory falls apart. And then when you find out that, well, those form after you leave the slide out to evaporate for like 6 hours, or you come back the next day and then they're there, we don't have any footage of them forming. Those were all problems that I found with some of these theories. And there's a lot of folks in my audience that will still want to believe that there's nanobots and whatever else and these in these vaccines.
Kevin McCairn [00:09:02] Yes. And, you know, I. I get people wanting to think like that. Right. Because, you know, we are dealing with a conspiracy, for sure. There is that, you know, it's there in your face every day. It's there with the censorship of individuals, you know. And look, for as wrong as I think people are in their science and pushing this idea of you know, this next generation technology, the synthetic biology, taking over you and sucking away your soul, for want of a better description. And still… in order to push back against that, you must use accepted scientific criteria. Otherwise, you're just going to get swept off the table, right, when you come to try and challenge these people, what's going to happen is that someone like ... You know, I'll use the "no virus" group as an example, because there are sort of common names that pop up in there all the time that people do know. And, you know, whether it's Andrew Kaufman, the Baileys, Cowan, David Icke, for example, that they make a challenge in the courts and say, 'we think that there's or we've got evidence that there's graphene oxide in these samples. And here you go, Your Honor. Here's our reports and evidence.'
[00:10:42] And what's going to happen is that the courts are going to take a look at that. They'll bring, if you manage to get a prosecution, then the other side are going to come and just demonstrably show how that's not the case. All right. And, you know, they'll do what I did, which is live recording and analysis under, you know, what's accepted as a way to examine these objects and the chemistry. And it'll get swept aside. You get blown out of the water and any form of pushback that we're able to mount, which is minimal at the moment. I get silenced, left, right and center, to the point where within the last couple of weeks, that they've de-banked me and trying everything that they can to limit my reach.
Sam Dotson [00:11:32] Mm hmm.
Kevin McCairn [00:11:34] And, you know, de-banking me means that I can't raise funds to go to the laboratory to do these tests. The simple fact is, it costs money to do that. Right? And if I can't pay to go and do these experiments, then, yeah, then they can shut down people like myself who are a problem and they would amplify the "no virus, graphene oxide" side to the point where again, people who don't have the time to invest in this, who are stuck in the middle, for want of a better expression, and rely on expert testimony. And all the experts, I would argue, have been brought up or or just don't have the patience or the wherewithal to really understand the scientific literature and what it means. Anyway, point being, we got to this stage where we did these experiments and we did the Raman spectroscopy and anything that looked like the examples of graphene oxide gave back a signal that was cholesterol and what you'd expect with the lipid nanoparticle that makes up the carrier of the vaccine itself. And so, you know, that's one data point and we can sort of be somewhat confident. Again… the number of samples is limited. But I would just remind people it's amazing how, though the other side seemed to find graphene oxide immediately in their samples, and, you know, I go and look and do it properly. Oh, there's nothing there. So the next step to go and do is you want to do some type of elemental analysis, mass spectrometry. And a way of doing this is to use EDX mapping. It's Elemental Dispersive X-ray mapping. And it's a more recent technique for looking at elements. And what I was doing with the... So this is coupled with scanning-electron [microscopy].
Sam Dotson [00:14:03] Compared to the laser, You're saying?
Kevin McCairn [00:14:07] Sorry?
Sam Dotson [00:14:07] Compared to the laser, you're saying it's a more resistant problem?
Kevin McCairn [00:14:12] Raman Spectroscopy is just looking at molecular bonds. That's all. It doesn't give you any data as to the elemental composition. And when I say elemental, think: the periodic table and elements.
Sam Dotson [00:14:27] Right.
Kevin McCairn [00:14:27] So. And biology tends to be made from carbon, hydrogen and oxygen, nitrogen and phosphorus. And then some transition metals. And metals are thrown in for good measure. And the reason I did scanning electron microscopy / EDX is because it's a contained set of instruments and it does high power magnification like electron microscopy. So you can see very, very fine detail. And my idea was to go and look at that point at these so-called crystals, which people think are these nanobots. And, you know, we can see them. …You can go see the streams that I've done online and in finding them, what I did is the elemental EDX mapping. And we got signals for carbon and hydrogen, which you would expect, but no phosphorus and no nitrogen. Now, there's some debate in that particular technique, whether it's that sensitive to nitrogen. And so not seeing a nitrogen signal is something that I would be, you could argue, yeah, you need to do another method. But phosphorus definitely should be there. Okay. And we didn't get a signal. And this was on the first round of experimentation. And in doing that experiment and coming back, I wasn't even thinking so much about the phosphorus. I was, my mind was still on the graphene oxide. And during that time, or in between me doing that first set of experiments, there was a doctor in Canada who was being quite vocal against the vaccine programs in Canada itself, and he did the same EDX mapping, etc. And he pointed out that there was no phosphorus or, again, nitrogen in this instance.
Sam Dotson [00:16:44] Okay.
Kevin McCairn [00:16:45] And it was his work —his name is Dr. Daniel [Nagase], and I want to make sure that people get credit for doing work. I don't want to sort of say “I know I did it first,” etcetera. But the thing is, I had the same data as he did, and I saw talks that he gave, which said that there appears to be no biological material in this. But he didn't do the Raman spectroscopy like I had. And the problem is that he went down the avenue of thinking that there's these nano type robots, nanobots in there. And I'm reluctant to go down that path all the time. We can find a more parsimonious explanation with the data. So I looked at my data and yet for sure we didn't see phosphorus. And so I did another round of experimentation, this time with fresh ... No, we didn't have [any] fresh at this time. These were unopened bottles. I went back to check the bottles that we did have, but I went back with samples that I knew must contain phosphorus. And was the SEM EDX capable of picking out the phosphorus in these samples? And sure enough, we were able to pick out phosphorus.
Sam Dotson [00:18:18] So those were unopened vials, but expired maybe? or is that...
Kevin McCairn [00:18:23] So, they'd been opened the first time we went to do the Raman and the SEM EDX. So it was a few weeks between doing the experiments.
Sam Dotson [00:18:33] Okay. And. I mean, is there degradation going on because they're not at -84 degrees or whatever it is?
Kevin McCairn [00:18:42] It wouldn't matter because even if the RNA broke down, the elements would still be in there. They have not evaporated off or anything. That's the power of doing the elemental analysis. You get … So you could make an argument that Raman might not be such a good idea.
Sam Dotson [00:19:00] Okay. I understand.
Kevin McCairn [00:19:01] The EDX mapping will give you a readout of the core elements, what you would find on the periodic table. And yes, sure enough, we could find phosphorus in all the samples that we knew contained phosphorus. And then we've been paused there, waiting for access to the new unopened samples to begin the process of confirming the experiments. Because you have to do these experiments again and again. You can't just go off the first result and say, Yeah, here we are, it's done and dusted. That isn't, again, how science works. And we need to be in a situation where we're able to genetically sequence the contents, should we find the signature of phosphorus. And so, you know, we're at this point now where we need to be able to do these experiments. And I have fresh bottles to analyze.
[00:20:15] And, you know, there's an impasse because, like I say, in that time between doing those experiments, getting data out that shows that there are blanks in the circulating [vaccine supply]. And, what that means at the end of the day, is that either there's a terrible manufacturing quality control issue, or the companies who are putting out these products are seeding the field, if you like, with benign shots. And the reason they would do that, I would argue, is that they would try to do that to lower the adverse-event to shots-given ratio.
[00:21:09] And you know, right now I'm in a situation where, like, say, in the last few weeks, I've had a PayPal taken away from me and my channels taken down, left, right and center. And and, you know, I'm at a point where I'm just trying to raise the money to get back into the lab again, to do these experiments, to run through them and, you know, hopefully get my hands on stuff where we can know the provenance and have the [cold (?)] chain completely established and what should be active shots that get sequenced locally so we know what the gene expression products are in those vials. Because you know … it's a somewhat technical domain, but the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, which has a lot of the indications of … synthetic manipulation. It contains epitopes that shouldn't be there, epitopes that line up with HIV.
Sam Dotson [00:22:17] Right.
Kevin McCairn [00:22:18] We need to know if they're in there, the degree to which they express, etc., and what that would mean to someone who was exposed to them. And yep, that's basically where we are. That's the summation.
Sam Dotson [00:22:33] Okay. So I'm facing all of those same issues I just got hit with from my crypto account. They want me to re verify my identity. I've been with them for like five years. They've never done this before. I've, uh, I got StarLink and raised $750. They flagged that and then denied the KYC/AML process so that those funds all got returned. I'm facing exactly the same thing. They are cracking down any way they can. And I'll share with you some things after the show that might be an option for you to use, depending on specifics and so forth.
Kevin McCairn [00:23:14] Sure.
Sam Dotson [00:23:16] Oh, okay. So … let's say that the mRNA that is not in there is … what the lack of phosphorus is suggesting, and it's just LNP. That's still going to be highly toxic, but it's going to reduce the transfection and the autoimmune diseases and so forth. Can you talk about the dangers of the LNP and what we might expect to see if that's the case —that they're just now all of a sudden injecting people with solely the lipid nanoparticle?
Kevin McCairn [00:23:52] Yeah. So the lipid nanoparticle itself is known to be... It induces inflammation. Now, the brochure that comes from the pharmaceutical companies is that the lipid nanoparticle gets put into the muscle, drains into the lymph node, and goes to the liver where it's broken down, etc.. Yeah, that's in some respects true. But it's a very limited, cartoon-like understanding of what happens with anything that's injected intramuscularly. So … when you inject it intramuscularly, it will go into the systemic circulation. And if you inject intramuscularly, there's a chance that you can hit a blood vessel and then it will go in as a sort of an I.V. directly into the bloodstream, it will spread much farther and can impact many, many more organs. And there's been studies that were done very early on which compared injecting just lipid nanoparticle into muscle versus I.V. And if you … do it I.V., then you get these inflammatory markers and cardiac damage that we see. And I think … well, it can compound issues because we know that the spike protein damages heart muscle itself. And couple that with the lipid nanoparticle, there's a double whammy. But even the lipid nanoparticle itself … can kick off inflammatory cascades and cause you problems. Now, most people might be able to handle it, clear it, generally might feel a bit yucky for a day or two and think that there's nothing unexpected that you wouldn't get from any other vaccine. But again, we're in an environment where we're having to address multiple advanced scientific concepts. Again and again.
Sam Dotson [00:26:08] Okay.
Kevin McCairn [00:26:13] It's an uphill struggle all the time. And, you know, like I say, it's good fun poking the "no virus" people because it's entertaining. But the real issue is this censorship and control grid that's being built up around us and the QR code society that's heading our way and we're walking into it and they've got people nailed to the floorboards. Particularly if you've got to go to work every day. And we know all the threats that have been given to companies, etcetera. Because how many companies are dependent upon sort of government grants and tenders, etcetera. And, and, you know, if you're shown not to be complying, then that company is going to do what it thinks is in its best interests and it will take a workforce that's compliant. And so if you're not prepared to go down the vaccine route, whether it's blanks or actual vaccines, etc., then they're just going to get rid of troublemakers. And we either make this stand now —look, it might be too late. This may have been a fight that should have been done back in the seventies, for all I know, as they tried to break unions and they went on this massive privatization push or [when] they de-industrialized and shifted industries away from countries to the East, etc.. Maybe that was when the battle needed to be fought. But right now it's not parents who are the ones who are taking the brunt here. They're literally coming for children at this stage. And, you know, I'm morally and ethically obliged to say 'no' at this point and do everything that I feasibly can to to try to warn people of where it is that we're heading. And look, in this sense, where I would overlap with the people who think that there's graphene oxide and there's no such thing as viruses. Right? Because their concerns are the medical tyranny that's coming. I get that. But again, you've got to you've got to be able to fight smarter than just going down logical fallacies, ill-informed opinions, etc., because you'll get picked off and it's of vital importance right now to support what is a very, very small band of scientists that have been speaking out from the beginning about the abuses that are taking place and making sure that we can continue to keep experimenting, keep testing, and come with data. Come with data that's admissible to courts for when we do get them into courts of law.
Sam Dotson [00:29:31] Yeah, that's right. I know you're also working with Dr. Richard Fleming quite a bit, going on that avenue and he's doing his tour thing around the country, raising awareness on these issues as well. You know, I think that they are trying to collapse society. I think we're going to see such a huge die-off from this thing, I've been talking about, that the airlines are going to fail. Most companies out there are going to fail because they just won't have the key people that they need or enough people to continue operations. We're in this footprint that's big enough that that exists because there's X number of people in the world. And if we lose some significant portion of that population, we're going to have to reorganize society in a lot of, I think, very fundamental ways. At the same time, we have the dollar that's hyperinflating and that's going to fail. And they want to roll us into a CBDC, central bank digital currency where they have visibility and control on a per-transaction basis. ‘Oh, Kevin, you're trying to get some lab time. No, no! And we're going to deduct 100 credits from your account because you tried to do this’ or because you donated. Or someone donated to you and they get punished. And that's the world they want to take us into. I think what's available and our hope should be focused on cryptocurrency. There are some out there like Monero, like XX Coin, where it's completely anonymous. It is basically digital cash. There's no visibility of account balances or transactions except to the end user. And XX network also has a secure messaging platform that I trust more than, uh, Signal or WhatsApp or any of the other end-to-end encrypted networks out there. Because they've engineered their own protocol, basically, something they call cMix, whereas most of the other cryptocurrencies and projects out there, they're using the government-recommended algorithms. Right? And they're recommending them for a reason, probably because they have a backdoor in it, and can snoop any time they like. So there is, there is hope, but I think we've got some hard times to go through here and I'm very grateful that there's people like you out there that are, you know, working to stop this, to raise awareness to it.
[00:32:08] And I just want to go back and clarify: so you had done these analyses multiple times and you saw no phosphate and then you saw phosphate. And then in the last batch, no phosphate again. Is that correct or...
Kevin McCairn [00:32:26] So no phosphorus in these vaccine samples that I had. Where we could detect phosphorus were in other samples that had known phosphorus or theoretically should have phosphorus.
Sam Dotson [00:32:40] Known samples of...
Kevin McCairn [00:32:40] Sorry you broke up a little bit.
Sam Dotson [00:32:43] Okay. So this is where you're using controls, basically?
Kevin McCairn [00:32:48] Yes.
Sam Dotson [00:32:49] I wasn't sure if you were talking about a different vaccine or just controls.
Kevin McCairn [00:32:53] These are. And I'm happy —it would make sense that I do get vaccines —once we get our hands on them— that do have a phosphorous signal in them. And it's those ones that I would then send for gene sequencing.
Sam Dotson [00:33:09] Okay.
Kevin McCairn [00:33:10] And to find out exactly what the … proteins are that you would be expressing. Because the thing is, there's no there's no way of actually knowing. It's just trusting these companies.
Sam Dotson [00:33:25] Who have put out these gene sequences of the spike, basically.
Kevin McCairn [00:33:29] Yeah.
Sam Dotson [00:33:29] Okay.
Kevin McCairn [00:33:30] Because you have to do the expression product experiments to even get an idea. You can't just go and do the simple chemical analysis like I was doing. Because even if I recognize that there's phosphorus, I get a hit that phosphorus in this vaccine vial. Okay, there's something there. But I don't know what it is in terms of the biology. And like I say, it could be spike protein itself. It could be other peptides as well. Right now. And … as a scientist you should be suspicious of any data anyway. But under the current environment in which we find ourselves, I would urge people to be incredibly cautious right now. Because they can —as I say, who's doing the controls? Where, who's doing the objective and unbiased —meaning that they're not linked to the hip, to government contracts in any way? In fact, I think very, very few people would be able to pull that off.
Sam Dotson [00:34:44] Okay. [laughs] All right. Is there anything else you want to say? I think that has answered my questions, and I appreciate you taking the time. Is there anything else you want to go [over]? I mean, so basically… I guess I can ask you one more thing: If you're able to get a gene sequence of what's actually in the vial, that would give you further insights into things like the GP120 inserts that contain the HIV sequences and the PRRA, I think it is, at the FCS cleavage site?
Kevin McCairn [00:35:16] The Furin Cleavage Site, yeah.
[00:35:16] Okay. Yes. And then you're just at the next step of experimentation, which is to put it into a test platform.
Sam Dotson [00:35:23] Okay.
Kevin McCairn [00:35:24] And that means cell expression systems and animal models. Right. And then and then we'll see, because there's a whole issue around —again, this is something that I immediately — well this is when the censorship kicked in— because I would say that SARS has this neurotrophic element to it, which means brain-invading. And viruses that are brain-invading are linked to neurodegenerative disorders —Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, AIDS actually, is one of the primary, HIV is one of the primary viruses that we associate with it. And so what that means is that there are understood mechanisms from a neuroscience perspective as what causes the neurodegeneration. And that's this build up of amyloid-like proteins in the brain. The fibrillary tangles that, again, are correlated with —and there's some evidence that it's causal, because you can refine those proteins down, inject them into the brain of another host, and they will develop the same neurodegenerative conditions. Now, the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 contains a number of amyloidogenic sequences, not just the HIV GP120, but there are other peptide sequences around it which cause these types of problems. And so we need to test this. And they've done experiments with the virus itself and shown in non-human primates that you can get amyloid build up in the brain.
Sam Dotson [00:37:18] Okay.
Kevin McCairn [00:37:18] And that's from SARS-CoV-2 itself. And recent work has shown that there are two gene sequences that sit outside the spike protein that are highly amyloidogenic that are not present in other SARS viruses —and again, in my view, in the current environment— have to be put in the context of next-generation biowarfare agents.
Sam Dotson [00:37:46] Yeah.
Kevin McCairn [00:37:47] And this is what people have really got to get into their minds, Okay? It goes deeper than just viral infection. We're in an age where they can leverage this protein chemistry, if you like, to nudge you towards these degenerative conditions. And the fact that they're in the spike protein itself, and the spike protein from the vaccine, which is made with this synthetic type of mRNA where they're using pseudouridinated mRNA, which is a way of making the mRNA stealth to avoid being broken down.
Sam Dotson [00:38:30] [garbled] Okay.
Kevin McCairn [00:38:31] And it means that it persists far, far longer than what they were telling people. And they said, oh, within a couple of days it's removed from your body, etc., and broken down. But it's not. You know there's data out there which shows that it persists for at least 60 days —and that's just in the lymph nodes.
Sam Dotson [00:38:54] And I want to ask you right there: [Jycki(?)] was concerned about the pseudouridine substitution, turning the stop codons into sense codons and then having a read-through risk into the three prime UTR. Is that something you've thought of? What are your thoughts on that?
Kevin McCairn [00:39:12] And again, I would —not that I disagree with Jycki. Jycki has been a real force for good in the environment in which we find ourselves. I would say theoretically, yes. But until we do the experiments and check the expression products itself, we don't know. But I wouldn't be surprised. My concern right now is that we're mass exposing people.
Sam Dotson [00:39:46] Yeah.
Kevin McCairn [00:39:48] ...through these gene transfection technologies. The spike protein is going to be produced at a chronic level. And then you're in a situation where you've got a runaway pandemic —like you're seeing with the omicron where people keep getting re-infected —and reinfected with these genes that are not part of the spike, which are highly amyloidogenic themselves. And you're going to create —again, I can only conjecture as to what the long-term consequences of it would be. But I would be very, very concerned about anything that's leveraging these amyloid pathways, these inflammatory pathways, and the impact that it's going to have on the brain.
Sam Dotson [00:40:46] Yeah. And I know Jycki is also he's wanting to get some ovary cells stained to see if there's amyloids in the ovaries because he thinks that's game over as well. So I'm going to reach out to see if maybe Dr. Cole or somebody has done something along those lines or can do it, because that would tell us quite a bit as well, right there.
Kevin McCairn [00:41:08] Yeah. And that's one of the experiments that we need doing. We need primates, we need rodents. And these organs need staining for amyloid. Look, we're in a situation where the... There are some studies which show that the genes for the spike are crossing into the cell nucleus.
Sam Dotson [00:41:41] Yes.
Kevin McCairn [00:41:42] And if that's true, again, you know, you're compounding this chronic inflammation and amyloid buildup such that you're on this long-term disease pathway that many, many people will be unable to make the association to the initial insult itself. And, you know, again, it's game over in that scenario.
Sam Dotson [00:42:16] Well, let me ask you: something that happened to me: So I'm not vaccinated. But during, I think it was like the third month, February-March timeframe last year, in 2021, when these vaccines were being rolled out, I went into Dallas and was working on a project around a lot of people and I got hit with one symptom and then another and then another. And I was reading a vaccine injury report talking about tinnitus and the person was experiencing one ear changing pitch. And like I've had tinnitus for years and years, it's been like a two or three because I was in drumline in high school and I had the loud stereo and all that, but I had never had experienced it changing pitch. And that's when it kind of hit me that, ‘Oh, these are all vaccine injuries.’ I don't know if I was exposed to just the spike or if perhaps there was some kind of exudate or mechanism by which I was exposed to actually the mRNA from somebody that shed it. Do you think that's a possibility? Could it survive outside the body like that to where... Because what happened is my testes got sore and inflamed and then the whole area got red with a rash. And I think that was maybe like the spike getting pumped out. It could have just been some kind of other inflammation going on. And then my nose, my ears stopped up and the tinnitus hit. And we know the LNP likes to collect in the reproductive organs and I'm kind of thinking maybe that's what happened to me even though I wasn't vaccinated. But at the same time, I don't know what you think about that, but also at the same time, exposure to the spike is exposure to the spike. And it's really —the game, at least as I talked to my audience about it, should be to minimize your exposure to spike because … it has this compounding effect as you're kind of describing. The more you're exposed to it, the more likely you are to have these various pathologies progressing and developing in your body. Is that right?
Kevin McCairn [00:44:24] Yeah. And so, shedding: I think we've got a mechanism that's been published now which is: as the body processes the mRNA, there's exosomal wrapping that occurs. And if, for example, a cell is expressing this protein on the surface and then it becomes dysregulated, then it can break off parts of the cell membrane to try to get rid of what it considers an abnormal protein. And you get these exosomes flowing through the blood, which are studded with spike protein. And shedding is something that's been recognized —with mRNA lipid or lipid-vectored mRNA— as a problem. It was in the literature for years before SARS-CoV-2 and more in the studies and the grants, etc. But I would say the tinnitus and the symptoms that you're describing are associated with SARS-CoV-2 itself.
Sam Dotson [00:45:40] Okay.
Kevin McCairn [00:45:41] And it could just as likely have been… We know that people who are infected can carry the virus —at high levels even— and not experience symptoms. Right? So it's more a gene-therapy-based therapeutic than a vaccine.
Sam Dotson [00:46:02] Right.
Kevin McCairn [00:46:03] And you could have been associated with someone who was vaccinated, carrying the virus and dealing with…
[00:46:14] Hang on one minute. I've just got to deal with the kids...
Sam Dotson [00:46:18] It is a very interesting conversation. I'm so glad we're having it. I was planning to do something like ten or twenty minutes, but we just kind of got going across the landscape here. And I'm really enjoying this discussion. I'm sure you guys are, too. Okay.
Kevin McCairn [00:46:37] I do apologize.
Sam Dotson [00:46:38] No worries. I had you on mute and I was chatting, so...
Kevin McCairn [00:46:43] The virus itself could be responsible. Did you get yourself tested?
Sam Dotson [00:46:50] I've never been tested. I just wanted to stay away from that because who knows what's on the swabs, right?
Kevin McCairn [00:46:56] Right. So, you know, you could have just had exposure to SARS back then. And then we were dealing with the more severe agents, the deltas, etc.. And, um. I would just...
Sam Dotson [00:47:13] Were you trying — it seemed like you were going down the route that if somebody — if I caught SARS-CoV-2 from somebody who was vaccinated, that may have a different impact? Is that the case?
Kevin McCairn [00:47:25] No. No, I would expect a mirroring.
Sam Dotson [00:47:30] Okay.
Kevin McCairn [00:47:32] And just the and the fact that you had the tinnitus emerge, and that's indicative of a sort of neuroinvasive response.
Sam Dotson [00:47:44] Yeah.
Kevin McCairn [00:47:46] And we know that the SARS is neuroinvasive. And so you could have picked it up. Like I say, it's aerosolized. It's gotten to your ears and then try… and because you had a problem to begin with, it's going to that. It is a weak pathway. And that was your exposure and those were your symptoms.
Sam Dotson [00:48:10] Okay. Okay. He's dealing with kids here real quick. That makes sense that I maybe just caught COVID and didn't actually know that that's what was happening because I didn't really have symptoms. I didn't get sick along with it. So. Okay, that's interesting.
Kevin McCairn [00:48:35] Hmm. And, you know, I think a lot of people are in this situation and this is the problem when we're dealing with these types of agents that are subtle and —not subtle, that's the wrong word. They leverage pathways that are not the classic pneumonia-type pathways. Respiratory pathogens. And this is something that I was trying to hammer home very, very early on, right from the beginning. SARS isn't a flu. It's not a pneumonia, as people understand it. And it's a systemic coagulopathy and a systemic coagulopathy that causes an expression of peptides that force amyloidosis. And so you've got clotting disorder and at the same time, you've got proteins there that are going around causing these amyloids to misregulate and begin the shift towards a degenerative and especially neurodegenerative phenotype. And, all I can do in these current circumstances is warn people that, look, the global stage is changing. And just look back in history how they've done it in the past.
Sam Dotson [00:50:09] Mm hmm.
Kevin McCairn [00:50:09] And, you know, they don't care. And so here's something that people often ask, well, why would they release a pathogen when they would be at risk of it? And what have we found out through Charles [Ricks'(?)] research?
Sam Dotson [00:50:28] Fusion Inhibitors. That they had the antidote from the beginning.
Kevin McCairn [00:50:33] Yeah.
Sam Dotson [00:50:34] And that this wasn't maybe not even the first attempt as well, that there have been other coronaviruses. This was like the most successful one. And then they're like, all right, we're going to run with it. Let's turn this into a pandemic. Give a bunch of people remdesivir to get the death numbers up with this COVID pneumonia nonsense, which was them drowning in their own fluids from Fauci's malfeasance and medication. And then, you know, the PCR testing created whatever numbers they need. And now, you know, the solution for that is Bill Gates' little diagnostic box that, no doubt, he's going to be able to upload new firmware [into] that determines an infection, what the parameters are for an infection —I have zero doubt that's how that little magical testing box is going to work, so that they can do this on a whim anywhere in the world they need to.
Kevin McCairn [00:51:26] And that's all extant technology. You don't need sci-fi nanobots, in that scenario, to explain everything that we're seeing.
Sam Dotson [00:51:39] Yeah.
Kevin McCairn [00:51:39] And again, I would just try to reiterate to people that we're in unparalleled, unprecedented times. And you've got to keep on top of the science to... Look. If you think that those reptiles are worried about people who think viruses aren't real? In a situation where we've got compounding pathologies after each exposure?
Sam Dotson [00:52:07] Mm hmm. You know…?
Kevin McCairn [00:52:10] They want that! Great. Let them get out there. Let them keep exposing themselves. Let them keep building the...
Sam Dotson [00:52:21] I think humanity could be just a science experiment, and they've decided to go a different direction, perhaps. And I mean, it could be as simple as that. Who knows? But certainly at least a possibility in my mind.
Kevin McCairn [00:52:36] You know, I was having a discussion this morning. Someone sort of concerned about my safety. They're concerned about sort of the headlines that make up the Green agenda, right? The overfishing and the pollinators disappearing, etc.
Sam Dotson [00:52:57] Climate change.
Kevin McCairn [00:53:00] But my concern right now is that we live in an age where, you know, human population is the biggest it's ever been. And the flow of information has reached a critical point where people do have a working knowledge of the history and the networks that have been behind the events that have shaped history.
Sam Dotson [00:53:25] Yeah.
Kevin McCairn [00:53:26] And so why wouldn't they try to limit the pool of people who are switched on to how we are being played a lot of the time. And you know, that could be reason enough to have a long-term depopulation agenda. You know, there's no need to do it in one go. You just keep hold of the propaganda feeds.
Sam Dotson [00:54:02] Yes.
[00:54:02] You keep people like myself out and yourself out, or with minimal ability to reach people and they'll get people who will just keep going along with the program to get along. Most Western countries are trapped. Who can survive a few months without a paycheck? I can't.
Sam Dotson [00:54:33] Not a lot. Yeah.
Kevin McCairn [00:54:34] Right. And so most people will, like I say, will go along to get along because the short-term impact is such that they've got no other choice. And so they will keep going for boosting. They will walk into these surveillance systems. They will do all of that. They will accept that their payments are now, you know, central programmable cards.
Sam Dotson [00:55:00] Company credit at the company store, basically a CBDC. Yeah, exactly.
Kevin McCairn [00:55:05] Yeah. Because it makes no difference then, because everyone's doing it with cards and digital anyway.
Sam Dotson [00:55:10] Yeah. They've been conditioned and driven down that road and I think that you're, you're also correct and um, you know, this is just the first round or not even really the first round, but the latest round and the next one is going to be, well, “because of climate change, we've got to cut fertilizer” —as we've seen in Canada, “we've got to take the farmers' land” —as they're trying to do in the Netherlands. And that's going to force famine —if not this winter, next winter. So they're yeah, they're just going to keep at it, keep whittling away until we say 'enough' and stand up to it. And at the same time, just as you point out, so many people are trapped in the system because they have all these things, and the government has grown so big, the bar is so high —to actually stand up to them it has to be done en masse. And like, ‘how is this going to work?’ I say, the odds are good that, you know, we do exactly what you're saying, go down that road, but at the same time, I think there's a chance, as things fall apart, as the currency fails, that we — and this is kind of the the crux of my show, of what I try to do with the audience, is explain to them: we've got to get away from these third-party intermediaries. We've got to be doing things amongst ourselves without the state involvement. We can't have, you know, like the people that want to tell me we've got to rebuild health care, and this, and that. I'm like: Are you kidding me? They just tried to mass murder us —and these job mandates and so forth— that was coercion to push a holocaust. We're we're still in the midst of a holocaust right now. And instead of gas chambers, they're using delayed reaction, soft-kill injectables. And we've got to recognize that and stop going along with this. And I don't know how bad it has to get before enough people realize that, but it couldn't come soon enough, if you asked me.
Kevin McCairn [00:57:16] Well, I would just add onto the soft-kill injectables, is pathogens themselves.
Sam Dotson [00:57:21] Okay.
Kevin McCairn [00:57:22] So, we know now that the spike protein will invade lymphocytes, etc. —you get a drop in T-cells. The same with the virus itself. We knew early on that SARS causes an even more severe drop in T cells than HIV does. And that got pointed out early on in the literature but that publication got pulled very early on —again for...
Sam Dotson [00:57:49] Was that Prudhon? Prudhon's paper?
Kevin McCairn [00:57:52] Sorry? No, no. This is a different paper. And then a few months back, literally the Wuhan Institute of Virology put out a paper confirming that T cells are susceptible to spike exposure from SARS-CoV-2 and by corollary, from the gene transfection technologies.
Sam Dotson [00:58:13] Okay.
Kevin McCairn [00:58:14] And. In that environment, you're going to be subject to opportunistic pathogens like an HIV patient would be.
Sam Dotson [00:58:24] I see.
Kevin McCairn [00:58:25] And, you know, I think we're seeing the next step come in right now where, you know, you've got a disfiguring condition. A disfiguring condition that we know that they've been trying, or engaged in experiments that would count as a Gain of Function, which is aerosolization of monkeypox. And and they've lit it up in the gay community. And now, we probably [didn't] but we know that there are different strains of monkeypox, some more lethal than others. And we're in an environment now where monkeypox is emerging. Right? You can. And you put it into a community that's susceptible to behaviors and, well, just medical interventions, right? The homosexuals are the ones that were, you know, lining up to get smallpox shots.
Sam Dotson [00:59:30] Mm hmm.
Kevin McCairn [00:59:31] Right? Just a few months ago. And as they begin to develop these very, very uncomfortable looking lesions, um, if we're dealing, and if we're in a situation where, again, covert warfare, because this is this is the paradigm in which we find ourselves, they can start going around aerosolizing monkey pox, think of the social disruption that that will cause, because immediately, you know, it's been tagged as a gay disease right now.
Sam Dotson [01:00:10] Yes.
Kevin McCairn [01:00:10] The gays are getting it and spreading it, right? But now they aerosolize it and now people are picking it up just through normal contact like you would with something like SARS-CoV-2. They've prepared the ground by releasing something like SARS, which has an impact on your ability to fight off infection. And now, you know, daddy comes home, he's got a case of monkeypox. Well, what's everyone going to think about daddy right now?
Sam Dotson [01:00:42] Mm hmm.
Kevin McCairn [01:00:43] Right? And this is how this warfare works. And the more they can break down society in this fashion, etc., and they will hold on to the line that it's more a contact disease and that they haven't aerosolized it. And again, you can't... How do you defend against the aerosolization? Right? Because you can just have someone with a rucksack walking through a train station.
Sam Dotson [01:01:13] Right.
Kevin McCairn [01:01:14] Pumping it out. Filling. Filling it. And you infect the whole train station that way. Or airport. And again, they've got a solution. More vaccines.
Sam Dotson [01:01:27] Yeah.
Sam Dotson [01:01:28] And, Kevin, I want to show you something real quick, and you'll be able to put me up on the screen here real quick. Um, this was something I covered in last night's show. I'm pretty. Yeah. Concerning antidotes, a close friend of mine who has been a nurse for over 30 years, retiring soon, just told me that she's blown away by the amount of women presenting this year, particularly this summer, with unexplained, extremely painful anal and vaginal lesions. And the second part of that right here is this same nurse is similarly concerned, blown away by the remarkably high number of HIV diagnoses, HIV complications, and men over the age of 35 presenting with sexually transmitted disease infection STD/STI with co-infections, typically 4 to 5 infections diagnosed at one time. So, you know, that's kind of along the same lines of what you're describing. I'm going to switch back here to you.
Kevin McCairn [01:02:28] I didn't see what you brought up. It didn't come up on the screen, sorry.
Sam Dotson [01:02:33] Okay. That's all right. It was just. It was a tweet that I was reading from.
Kevin McCairn [01:02:36] I think I got the [gist].
Sam Dotson [01:02:38] But, you know, these people's immune systems who have taken these shots have been decimated. All of the people that I've tracked down, and I think it's four so far, that I've seen that come on social media showing that they've got monkeypox lesions and so forth. I go back and search in their tweet history and they are vaccinated or they're advocating that everyone else get vaccinated. So highly likely they're all vaxxed and like, you know I dropped out of the dating sites over a year ago, citing this right here. Like, this is coming. If they are decimating people's immune systems, all of these latent viruses in these people are going to suddenly become active and they're not going to be able to fight them off anymore. And we're going to have major epidemics of sexually transmitted diseases. And I think that falls right in line with what you're saying about monkeypox, if it is the next SARS-CoV-2 and they've aerosolized it and weaponized it, it's going to be there's going to be a lot of fertile ground out there among the vaccinated. And then it's still going to be transmissible to other people, you know, nearby who like me, who are not vaccinated, but like I'm I'm dealing with I think this is my third bout of symptoms. People talk about long COVID kind of coming in spells. That's what I experienced. But very, very, you know, mild compared to what I see a lot of people on Twitter and elsewhere are dealing with. It's yeah, I think that's where they're taking us.
Kevin McCairn [01:04:13] Yep. Um, like I say it's a hypothesis, that's all.
Sam Dotson [01:04:17] It is.
Kevin McCairn [01:04:19] You know, maybe it is just as the authorities are telling us and it's all just natural spillover and, oh, you know, well it's because of our 'abuse of the environment,' right? Like I say, they’ve...
Sam Dotson [01:04:35] Too much gardening.
Kevin McCairn [01:04:37] …managed to...
Sam Dotson [01:04:37] Or, skipping breakfast. Definitely. Makes perfect sense. [Laughs]
Kevin McCairn [01:04:41] And again, like I say, I don't have all the answers here, but I can tell you that something's not right. Something's not working right. The institutions are not working right. The biology is not working as we expect it to.
Sam Dotson [01:05:05] It's been compromised.
Kevin McCairn [01:05:06] And well, I'll refine that: it's working exactly as it would if you're leveraging disease pathways.
Sam Dotson [01:05:15] Yeah.
Kevin McCairn [01:05:17] And you know, monkeypox should have been a blip on the radar and gone already.
Sam Dotson [01:05:22] Mm hmm.
Kevin McCairn [01:05:23] …and it hasn't. And I ran through a few [glass] slides the other day where? What do we know? MetaBiota has been working on monkeypox for many, many years. MetaBiota again is linked to...
Sam Dotson [01:05:45] Gates, I believe.
Kevin McCairn [01:05:47] Yeah. Gates but the Bidens and, uh, the well, just.
Sam Dotson [01:05:54] The Cabal.
Kevin McCairn [01:05:56] Companies...Yeah the Cabal, I guess, but Black & Veatch and the Rosemont-Seneca Fund. All are suspect at this point. And there are so many people that think that they're going to get along and they'll be okay, right now. And I'm not so sure that that's the case. And a willful blindness to what's going on isn't the appropriate posture to take.
Sam Dotson [01:06:28] Right.
Kevin McCairn [01:06:28] Right. You're in a fight. Gotta put your dukes up and do your best to defend yourself right now. And this is how twisted it gets. We're in this age where they've mass-surveilled people with respect to genome analysis. Right? Everyone's gone and taken those PCR tests, etc. and even if they don't get everyone, the nature of big data and genome science, etc. is if they can get enough of your relatives —whether, you know they're relatives or not— and they can pick out your genome and then and you're in the domain of binary agents. And so then you get something tailored directly for you. Like I said...
Sam Dotson [01:07:25] Do you think it's there? I mean, that seems like yeah, my whole, one of my biggest ah-ha's is understanding how little they actually know about the complexities of the immune system and how it functions. And I mean, that just seems, like, so far beyond capabilities that they have today, when I hear that.
Kevin McCairn [01:07:49] Um. Well, let's try and rephrase that.
Sam Dotson [01:07:54] Okay.
Kevin McCairn [01:07:54] The understanding of the immune system is not the common understanding that most people would have. You know, someone will have a grasp of antibodies, etc., and you need those. But I would say that the bleeding edge understanding of immunity, they understand.
Sam Dotson [01:08:18] Okay. But I mean, the complexities and all the interactions is kind of — specifically, it struck me, they think they can tinker with one thing over here and they don't understand the unintended consequences that are necessarily going to come out of that tinkering.
Kevin McCairn [01:08:37] Well except that, yeah, that would be under the assumption that what they're doing with respect to the impact on immune system wasn't the intended consequence.
Sam Dotson [01:08:51] Okay.
Kevin McCairn [01:08:52] Maybe they understood it perfectly well, and they knew that they would get this. Like I say, it's not like these agents went on to study for a long, long time in the public domain.
Sam Dotson [01:09:05] Yeah.
Kevin McCairn [01:09:06] So who knows what they've gone and tested behind closed doors? And this is why we need open and transparent testing to be done. This is why we need monkeys to be exposed properly and the experiments to be done such that we can see, in real time, the impact: if there's any legs to this hypothesis, what would we see? Exposure to SARS-CoV-2 will induce a drop in T cells and you will get a lymphopenia like you see with HIV. And that may be a transient phenomenon. And then start mixing in the vaccines themselves -- and they're not vaccines, the gene transfection insol.
Sam Dotson [01:10:02] Yeah.
Kevin McCairn [01:10:03] And then see how that plays out. And they might have understood all this implicitly. If we're dealing with a Cabal that doesn't mind flipping over the table every now and then to...
Sam Dotson [01:10:23] Reset the power balance because they're losing control.
Kevin McCairn [01:10:26] Yeah.
Sam Dotson [01:10:27] Yeah.
Kevin McCairn [01:10:28] Okay.
[01:10:28] And, you know, I would be — people have just got to stop thinking in the old...
Sam Dotson [01:10:38] Paradigm.
Kevin McCairn [01:10:39] Yeah, yeah. It's changed. The terrain has changed.
Sam Dotson [01:10:46] Yeah. When SARS first hit or when the when they started the lockdowns, I did a story on Shit Hit The Fan, prepping and so forth and I talked about a guy who relayed his stories from Bosnia and how one of the points he made that really stuck with me is he said that there were people in that situation that died, that perished because they failed to recognize that the paradigm, the fundamental paradigm that they were used to —no longer existed. The old systems were gone. Nobody was coming to save them. It was all out the window. And because they were still hanging on to that old paradigm, it cost them their life. And it was the people who could adapt and recognize that we're in a completely different situation here. The old rules don't apply and we've got to do what it takes to survive. Those are the ones who, you know, made it through to a large degree.
Kevin McCairn [01:11:44] Yeah, yeah. And here we are. And, you know, we've been cosseted in the West to think, oh, it can't happen here.
Sam Dotson [01:11:54] Now it is.
Kevin McCairn [01:11:55] Right. And oh, yeah, you wait and see. You wait and see. Everything that I see right now just keeps adding to that bin of data which says, oh, you know, 'you're in this next generation warfare.' It's not country against country. And you know.
Sam Dotson [01:12:19] The weapons are economic, they're biological, they're climate-based. And we're being hit with all of it. They're financial. I mean, they're, uh. What would it be? Electronic-based or, you know, hacking, attempts to basically disrupt economic function. And we're being hit with all of those, I think right now, all at once, to push as many different agendas and narratives as they can to bring about this reset because they know that if we find out before they're able to, I guess, shrink the population enough, it's going to be bad news for them. And, um, I hope that we get there and create that reality for these guys because they've earned it.
Kevin McCairn [01:13:08] Yeah. And that's precisely who I'm aiming at right now. And if there's a… Who are we talking about? Well, we know the bloodlines, etc… And, you know, there's a signature in Sars-Cov2 with advantageous polymorphisms. You know, who's who's less at risk? And you know, we know the Ashkenazi DNA is somewhat protective in this instance. Now, couple that with what we have as known antidotes —not, antidotes, preventatives— the fusion peptide inhibitors. Well, now suddenly they've got the odds stacked in their favor. Now they're prepared to instantiate their next move. And unless people grab a hold of this concept... Look, it's not just those with Ashkenazi genes. There's whole networks around them who have power as well or are in that league, for want of a better expression. So, you know, you’ve got to be careful about going down just that line of reasoning. Right? Oh, "it's the Jew." I mean, I make a joke about it in virtually every stream. But there's...
Sam Dotson [01:14:40] It's the Cabal. It really is.
Kevin McCairn [01:14:41] Every country has a power clique.
Sam Dotson [01:14:43] Yeah.
Kevin McCairn [01:14:46] And... they'll do anything. The reason they're in power is that they're the ones that are able to maintain a degree of psychopathy such that they will do anything and everything to screw over the other to get that little bit extra.
Sam Dotson [01:15:05] That's right.
Kevin McCairn [01:15:08] And you know, I wish I had better answers than this.
Sam Dotson [01:15:16] I don't think there is. There's not an easy answer here. We've got a hard road ahead of us. We have the numbers. They have the establishment, the systems and stuff that they control. And that's why, you know, really my focus on, my focus is on migrating away in whatever little ways we can now, and as they, as the system begins to fall apart, not going back and looking to the government to solve our problems again because well guys, they tried to kill us all. Let's go ahead and build things outside of that system without these third party intermediaries telling us, you know what we can and can't do. And I think we stand a chance of getting away from that and…
Kevin McCairn [01:16:02] Yeah.
Sam Dotson [01:16:02] It's not a great one.
Kevin McCairn [01:16:05] It's a situation, but the population is easier, it is more manageable. Yeah, right. It's smaller, splintered, etc. and okay, we might, we might get through and you know, they can, they don't mind.
Sam Dotson [01:16:18] Right.
Kevin McCairn [01:16:18] They can, they can handle a... Even if we lose half the population and we get down to like 3 billion people. And, you know, that's a massive reduction. And again, in that environment, most people would be scared shitless of doing anything.
Sam Dotson [01:16:39] Yeah. Most people are going to be in [internment] camps.
Kevin McCairn [01:16:44] Well, they don't need camps. It's digital ghettos.
Sam Dotson [01:16:48] Yeah.
Kevin McCairn [01:16:48] Maybe for the real problem makers. Right? They'll wheel you off. They can just isolate you digitally. And it's better that way because, again, everyone's dispersed. People can't see camps, so everything must be all right!
Sam Dotson [01:17:07] Mm hmm. Mm hmm.
Kevin McCairn [01:17:10] But if, you know, you don't know the details of your neighbors. Barely. Are they just managing to get by week to week? And you know, the lights come on and off.
Sam Dotson [01:17:22] A lot of them are. A lot of them are. Unfortunately.
Kevin McCairn [01:17:28] And, you know, I've probably made a termination to my line doing what it is that I'm doing right now. I get it. But, you know. I couldn't, in all conscience, sit quiet whilst this is going on. I can't. We've got history to rely on and we know what happens when they flip over the tables, and it's not stopping any time soon. People who think it's going to stop in six months need to wake up.
Sam Dotson [01:18:14] Yeah. Yeah.
Kevin McCairn [01:18:16] It's in motion now.
Sam Dotson [01:18:18] Absolutely. All right, Kevin, I'm going to end my show right here. I want to thank you so much for coming on. I'm happy to sit and chat with you some more on yours. Um, any final... McCairn Dojo there's your website. You do podcasts like all the time. You are in the lab doing experiments and so forth, filming those and broadcasting those out. You've just been booted from YouTube as I was long ago and I told you Twitch as well has booted me. There's so much censorship going on and you're facing some of the same financial challenges and rejections that I am as well. It's clear they don't want people talking about this. They want us going away silently in the night. Any final thoughts Sir?
Kevin McCairn [01:19:12] And I would again, I would just ask, you need to keep people like me in the fight, people like you in the fight, people who aren't afraid to speak up right now. Because what's coming down the line is... What's happened to us is coming for everyone else. And honestly, I wish I had more, better solutions in this instance, and I don't. It's analysis. And we need people who are able to break down the events in as real a time as possible and disseminate that information in as real time as possible so that it makes it more difficult for them. And in that sense, I would just ask your audience, please, sign on. Sign up, please. Please help me stay in the fight and don't let them rub out my timeline yet.
Sam Dotson [01:20:13] And I'm going to help you with some crypto options and so forth that might sort of create some viable solutions for you. And McCairnDojo.com Is that right? Okay. Very good. Thank you very much for taking the time. I really enjoyed this discussion. I hope to do it again sometime.
Kevin McCairn [01:20:41] Sure. Thanks very much, sir.